• Wildlife, Wireless & The Environment

    A Call for Protection

  • Unveiling the Impact

    Explore the Impact of Escalating Wireless Levels on Our Planet's Wildlife

  • Join Forces for Conservation

    Your Donation Fuels Research, Education, and Legal Efforts to Safeguard Wildlife

Preserve Nature from the Invisible Reality

…of Electromagnetic Pollution Endangering Our Wildlife & Ecosystems

As stewards of Earth, we are confronted with an unseen exposure, one that disproportionately affects our most vulnerable pollinators and wildlife. Wireless radiation and EMFs (Electromagnetic Fields) have emerged as a new form of environmental pollution, and their levels continue to rise unchecked.

Scientific research shows harmful impacts on animals and their habitat. Despite the clear and mounting scientific evidence, there are zero regulations in place to safeguard our ecosystems. Our current regulatory frameworks are humancentric, prioritizing people above wildlife and the natural world. 

The delicate balance of our Earth's biodiversity is at stake, threatened by the proliferation of cell towers and wireless technologies. Solutions exist for safer technology, but they are being ignored. 


Wireless radiation is more than just a technological advancement…

It is an environmental issue that necessitates immediate action.

Science Links Wireless Overexposure to Numerous Impacts. What Is At Stake?

  • Research has found impacts to reproduction, behavior, the immune system, as well as harm to embryonic and chick development from cell tower radiation and lower frequency non ionizing EMFs.

    Learn More

  • Studies on bees have found impacts to colony strength, the immune system, behavior, and orientation.

    Learn More

  • Cell tower radiation has been found to damage tree canopy. Studies find EMFs can impact plant growth and health.

    Learn More

Join The Campaign

Now is the time for science-based policy that protects our wildlife.

  • Birds plant wireless

    “Radiofrequency radiation poses harmful effects to flora and fauna. In a review of 113 studies from peer-reviewed publications, seventy percent of the studies concluded that radiofrequency electromagnetic fields had a significant effect on birds, insects and plants.”

    Natural Resources Defense Council, Amicus Brief for EHT et al v FCC, 2020

  • Sealife

    “Now we have 5G rolling out in massive quantities, without due diligence to determine are these sources of radiation safe not only for humans but for wildlife. And the answer is, no, they are not.”

    Albert M. Manville II, Ph.D. Retired Wildlife Biologist, Division of Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, Senior Lecturer and Adjunct Professor, Johns Hopkins University. Research Suggests Cell-Tower Radiation Harms Wildlife, 2022

  • Forest

    "Given the FCC’s lack of oversight and failure to comply with environmental laws, violations such as these represent a fraction of the environmental harms that occur under the agency’s watch.”

    Attorney Erica Rosenberg, former Assistant Chief of the Competition and Infrastructure Policy Division at the FCC, “Environmental Procedures at the FCC: A Case Study in Corporate Capture”, 2022

  • “Wildlife is unprotected…Long-term chronic low-level EMF exposure guidelines, which do not now exist, should be set accordingly for wildlife; mitigation techniques where possible should be developed; full environmental reviews should be conducted prior to the licensing/buildout of major new technologies like 5G; and environmental laws/regulations should be strictly enforced.”

    Blake Levitt, Henry Lai and Albert Manville “Low-level EMF effects on wildlife and plants: What research tells us about an ecosystem approach” Frontiers in. Public Health 2023